The aim of education is to educate our society, and it should be applied intelligently
Humans. But to do that, we must teach them to think, and we are not
to do that now teach, at least not in the U.S. than in our schools, we put to the test,
and we store your password so that children do not really think about it, too
at least most are not, and I have a problem with it. Move forward and talk
for the second.
To the people we need in order to improve oversight and have fewer children to teach thinking in the
Class, but of course, budget constraints, under-funded, bonds and money
are simply too great. But what if we use software to interact with the students – they asked
Issues and teaches them to think, while following along? Is this possible? Now, we
already have avatars and computer programs that interact with autistic children, and they do
So, so that the child brings art “of himself” and they get a little
Learn that they can not get in a small classroom, even with a ratio of 1:4 or
One-to-one lessons.
As artificial intelligence is better and stronger, why can not we develop computer
Programs that can do the same thing on a regular basis with the children? Now I know of a company
Atlanta created, it “software engineering”, and it would bind famous quotes
and sentences, and he could do in assimilating the basis of a conversation. The software
could also be used to see the authors to write really smart by borrowing pieces are
of famous quotes, they could include in their articles.
I contend that we are using the same software, but 10 generations
that the old software engineer, who was in the mid 90s to teach philosophy and children
think they get. Well, let me ask you then, and we can walk through them;
We can develop and use artificial intelligent software that teach philosophy in the future
Students so they are thinking, you change the story, and challenge the minds?
Why do I mention “change history” – that is simply because it is something that
DARPA has help to interact in social networks work, talking to people
possibly in the hostile intentions, such as terrorists, guerrillas, terrorists or just wolf
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6845054 Published: 27/01/2012
most disruptive of society. By questioning spirit to start a conversation, and
move this conversation to a positive note these people learn to interact
with others, and perhaps from the shells, and to reject their radical ideas and
Ideas.
Why can not we use to help all these software developments, giving students? I think we
possible. In fact, I’ve practiced with one of these software systems, and
actually works quite well. Best of all, it takes the information that I want to feed him, and can use
Changes in the information and the change of the words and derived from different
Instructions, interacting with others in the same or similar topics. This is roughly
cool, if you think about it and maybe we can teach our next generation of thinking, with
the process of social networks and interactive they do for fun in the education system
Process.
© 2012 Philosophy Of Education
